ملخص الدراسة:

This study deals with one of the questions related to the defects science "Elm Al-e'lall". It explains the problem why Al-Bukhari narrated on the authority of Hushaym in his book "Sahih Al-Bukhari" in spite of "Hushaym" being a concealer "Mudallis" from the third group. Using the inductive approach in collecting and comparing the narrations, here are the main results:-Al-Bukhari mentioned fifteen narrations in which Hushaym did not declare that he heard the target Hadith using the word "Sami'tu = I heard". Some of these narrations are found with declaration of narrations using "haddathana = he narrated to us" in another place in Sahih Al-Bukhari.-Some of these narrations are found with declaration of hearing using "Sami'tu = I heard" in books other than Sahih Al-Bukhari.-Some of Hushaym's narrations were authenticated with other narrations mentioned by other trustworthy narrators.-In some other cases, Al-Bukhari did not narrate on the authority of Hushaym except the Hadiths which were narrated by the most reliable teachers and Sheikhs of Hushaym.

توثيق المرجعي (APA)